Changing the AI Narrative: Embracing Defiant Optimism
Since January, I have led multiple faculty development sessions on generative AI for faculty at my university. Attitudes from faculty
April 2024
April 15, 2024 | By Cara Ruggiero and Cheryl Tice
April 15, 2024 | By Aubrey Statti and Kelly M. Torres
For online faculty, I think it’s more important than ever to be conspicuously human in the classroom, finding ways to lean into the distinctive
“AI is not a straightforwardly good thing for education. It is not a neutral tool that we can look forward to transforming our classrooms, schools and universities over the next few years. Instead, the very idea of AI is something that needs to be extensively scrutinised, challenged and questioned by those who make decisions that affect education, and those who work in the field of education. The future of AI in education is perhaps best approached as a struggle—as something to be contested rather than a fait accompli, something to be taken as given. . . . [as] a problematic to be investigated rather than a problem to be solved.”
Neil Selwyn, “The Future of AI and Education: Some Cautionary Notes”
Since January, I have led multiple faculty development sessions on generative AI for faculty at my university. Attitudes from faculty
In this high-tech era teachers often look askance at blackboards, most of which aren’t even black any more. Blackboards are
Over the past half century, colleges and universities have prioritized students’ global awareness and intercultural communication skills as institutional outcomes.
Magna Publications © 2024 All rights reserved